Physics of Reality - 1
Faced with uncertain futures, and distressed by unconquerable disease, decay and death, Man has been
in pursuit of an eternal, immutable and unbounded “something,” ever since, perhaps,
he has become aware of his own capability to think abstractly. The
ultimate quest has been the same whether the investigating men followed a
predominantly philosophical path or adopted an analytical approach. The Scientific method, however, splurged the
society in general with a bounty of little goodies, the by-products of its
analytical search, that could at least tentatively alleviate the suffering and bring
about a degree of amelioration to the people at large.
Clarity in thought and precision in expression are the
hallmarks of the method of scientific investigation. The former helped in
evolving a well-defined standard terminology and the latter contributed
to the achievement of accuracy in measurement and freedom from bias in
observation. Of all the various branches of Science, Physics excels itself in
both clarity and precision. So it is interesting to ask, ‘What does Modern
Physics tell us with respect to the most ancient question that man has raised?’
Quantum Mechanics says that ‘our observations influence the
universe at the most fundamental levels, because the boundary between an
objective "world out there" and our own subjective consciousness
blurs at those levels.’ As Tim Folgers put it, “When physicists look at the
basic constituents of reality— atoms and their innards, or the particles of
light called photons— what they see depends on how they have set up their
experiment. A physicist's observations determine whether an atom, say, behaves
like a fluid wave or a hard particle, or which path it follows in traveling
from one point to another. From the quantum perspective the universe is an
extremely interactive place.”
Prof. John Wheeler, ‘one of the last of the towering figures
of 20th-century physics, after a lifetime of fundamental contributions in
fields ranging from atomic physics to cosmology, suggested that our
observations might actually contribute
to the creation of physical reality.' To Wheeler "we are not simply bystanders
on a cosmic stage; we are shapers and creators living in a participatory
universe. Wheeler's hunch is that the universe is built like an enormous
feedback loop, a loop in which we contribute to the ongoing creation of not
just the present and the future but the past as well.”
Self-excited Universe (Wheeler) |
Tim Folgers continues: “Wheeler conjectures we are part of a
universe that is a work in progress; we are tiny patches of the universe
looking at itself — and building itself. It's not only the future that is still
undetermined but the past as well. And by peering back into time, even all the
way back to the Big Bang, our present observations select one out of many
possible quantum histories for the universe.
Does this mean humans are necessary to the existence of the
universe? While conscious observers certainly partake in the creation of the
participatory universe envisioned by Wheeler, they are not the only, or even
primary, way by which quantum potentials become real. Ordinary matter and
radiation play the dominant roles. Wheeler likes to use the example of a
high-energy particle released by a radioactive element like radium in Earth's
crust. The particle, as with the photons in the two-slit experiment, exists in
many possible states at once, traveling in every possible direction, not quite
real and solid until it interacts with something, say a piece of mica in
Earth's crust. When that happens, one of those many different probable outcomes
becomes real. In this case the mica, not a conscious being, is the object that
transforms what might happen into what does happen. The trail of disrupted
atoms left in the mica by the high-energy particle becomes part of the real
world.
At every moment, in Wheeler's view, the entire universe is filled with such events, where the possible outcomes of countless interactions become real, where the infinite variety inherent in quantum mechanics manifests as a physical cosmos. And we see only a tiny portion of that cosmos. Wheeler suspects that most of the universe consists of huge clouds of uncertainty that have not yet interacted either with a conscious observer or even with some lump of inanimate matter. He sees the universe as a vast arena containing realms where the past is not yet fixed.”
At every moment, in Wheeler's view, the entire universe is filled with such events, where the possible outcomes of countless interactions become real, where the infinite variety inherent in quantum mechanics manifests as a physical cosmos. And we see only a tiny portion of that cosmos. Wheeler suspects that most of the universe consists of huge clouds of uncertainty that have not yet interacted either with a conscious observer or even with some lump of inanimate matter. He sees the universe as a vast arena containing realms where the past is not yet fixed.”
If we ask whether Physics will be able to at all find
answers to the fundamental questions like ‘why the universe came into
being?,’ Wheeler feels that whereas the
fundamental “Why?” questions may be a bit tricky, we may be able to answer at
least “How?” part.
Andrei Linde who contributed to the theory of Inflationary
universe is confident that Physics may be able to find an answer someday to the
fundamental questions we ask, though we do not have a surefire answer as of
now. He says encouragingly, “You know, if you say that we're smart enough to
figure everything out, that is a very arrogant thought. If you say that we're
not smart enough, that is a very humiliating thought. I come from Russia, where
there is a fairy tale about two frogs in a can of sour cream. The frogs were
drowning in the cream. There was nothing solid there; they could not jump from
the can. One of the frogs understood there was no hope, and he stopped beating
the sour cream with his legs. He just died. He drowned in sour cream. The other
one did not want to give up. There was absolutely no way it could change anything,
but it just kept kicking and kicking and kicking. And then all of a sudden, the
sour cream was churned into butter. Then the frog stood on the butter and
jumped out of the can. So you look at the sour cream and you think, 'There is
no way I can do anything with that.' But sometimes, unexpected things happen.”
Let us return now to the question whether the universe is really participatory? It maybe 'participatory,'
yes; but is it a universe? No! We can only talk in terms of a participatory universe per a reference frame -- one at a time. We create a universe every instant. We shall take up in our next Post how it is so.
(To Continue ... Physics of Reality - 2)